Sie befinden sich aktuell in den SolutionsAcademy: Blog-Archiven für den folgenden Tag 13.2.2007.
- Allgemein (14)
- 6.7.2010: Talking about SF?
- 14.8.2009: Let them eat cake!
- 26.7.2009: The pursuit of happiness
- 12.7.2009: How do we know that what we do works?
- 13.6.2009: Is SF about always looking at the bright side?
- 14.1.2009: Inductive / Deductive / Instructive / Destructive?
- 13.1.2009: Christmas present(ation)
- 5.12.2007: Long time no blog... what I have been up to
- 3.4.2007: Betty Alice Erickson in Amsterdam
- 2.3.2007: "More Women into Top-Management Positions"
Archive für 13.2.2007
Dr. Stranglove’s Game
13.2.2007 von kirsten.
I’m sitting in the train station of Brussels, have just missed my train, and the next is not for 3 hours. I thought this was the 21st century, but, somehow, I must be mistaken. So I bought hideously expensive internet access *you probably can guess by now that I am not an entirely happy cookie*, read my emails and then thought, why not share with you a very interesting and amusing book:
Paul Strathern. Dr. Strangelove’s Game: A Brief History of Economic Genius. London: Penguin, 2001.
Here are some of my favorite quotes from it:
“Instability would appear to be fundamental to any such [financial] system, and it is arguably the very nature of how it works.”
Interesting when you view it from a complexity theory standpoint, I think. We cannot know everything about it, but we must still try and keep the international financial system from crashing somehow.
From Robert Owen, the founding father of the British trade unions who was one of the first to find out that happy and educated workers are more productive:
“Marriage is an unnatural crime [which] destroys the finest feelings and best powers of the species, by changing sincerity, kindness, affection, sympathy and pure love into deception, envy, jealousy, hatred and revenge…”
For those who wonder why I like this statement, remember I went to school in Berkeley … and, like Owen, I am married …
and on a more serious, discursive note:
“Money did not have a self, it had a function. Money wasn’t pieces of gold, or even the things for which they could be exchanged. It wasn’t a thing, it was a action … Money should be regarded as a verb, not a noun.”
(This is Stathern taking about John Law, the person to invent paper money)
Have fun with these…
Kirsten
Geschrieben in Allgemein | Drucken | Keine Kommentare »