- Allgemein (13)
- 14.8.2009: Let them eat cake!
- 26.7.2009: The pursuit of happiness
- 12.7.2009: How do we know that what we do works?
- 13.6.2009: Is SF about always looking at the bright side?
- 14.1.2009: Inductive / Deductive / Instructive / Destructive?
- 13.1.2009: Christmas present(ation)
- 5.12.2007: Long time no blog... what I have been up to
- 3.4.2007: Betty Alice Erickson in Amsterdam
- 2.3.2007: "More Women into Top-Management Positions"
- 22.2.2007: body, mind, and soul and other useless distinctions
Christmas present(ation)
My wonderful ex-husband gave me Edward Tufte “The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint — Pitching Out Corrupts within”, a very insightful booklet. How unfortunate it is to reduce our conversations to 5 bullets on a sequence of slides is especially apparent when you compare Lincoln’s Ghettysburg address to its rendition in Powerpoint
Speaking in bulletpoints naturally reduces the complexity of our thoughts, conjunctions and relations get lost (but aren’t they unnecessary complications, anyway?). Tufte quotes the Harvard Business Review, 76 p.44 (Shaw, Bron, Bromiley): “Bullets leave critical relationships unspecified. Lists can communicate only three logical relationships: sequence (…), priority (…), or simple membership in a set.” Necessary conditions, differentiation, causality cannot easily be expressed in a list (except, maybe, as members in a set).
One of my favorite Wittgenstein quotes is “I will teach you differences” (letter to Drury 1967, found in Danièle Moyal-Sharrock, Perspicuous Presentations). How can we present to one another in ways that recognize and take into account differences? How can we design and deliver information in ways that make us think rather than lulling us to cognitive slumber? Presentations with subtitles for the hard of thinking are certainly not the solution.